Saturday, August 29, 2026

Winner's Choice

Just when you thought we were done with looking at the 1971 Topps Winners set (which is actually from 1972) some additional information has come to light from an unusual source, namely one of the actual winners of the contest!  Jake Ingebrigston, who has done the deepest of dives on the set, was able to establish contact with Brucette A. Rumenyak, who has retained, over half a century (!) later, some of the correspondence that went out to her from Topps.

If you don't fully recall, this was her Winners card:


I've shown that front before but not the back:


It is a sign of the time that her softball team was called the Hot Pants!

Now, I mentioned correspondence and here we go. Sy Berger let Brucette know she had been chosen as, well, a winner!


I still can't believe six kids took the baseball card sets over having their own cards, but they did. 

As those of us who collected back in this era, the Topps cards usually debuted around the end of spring training. Topps Sales Promotions Manager Carl Spinella wrote to Brucette and let her know things were happening as Sy's mention of March 1 had come and gone:

Sure enough, four weeks later, Sy Berger (well, his secretary I'd say) sent her a letter along with the goods. Note how Topps picked her two favorite players to mention within:

Mr. Ingebrigston passed along this interesting tidbit:

"A guy she didn't know approached her in college and said he had her Winners card. With my finding a Wilke in a large stash of early 70's cards along with this story, I think it's very safe to say these cards saw some distribution in some form of retail."

So, has anyone out there pulled a Winners card from a 1972 pack?

More from Jake:

"I believe 14 of the 19 cards made their way out the back door at Topps HQ. Perhaps through the Card Collectors Co.. The 5 not included are April Bole, Steve Wilke, Carl Scatena, Patricia Cox, and Philip Edgerly. I believe any example of these 5 (with the exception of the uncut sheet you reported on that was eventually cut and sold as a set) either originated in packs or from the subject themselves. These are exponentially more difficult than the other 14. It’s not even close."

He is looking into this, so we may have even more to come!  Meanwhile, Brucette also offers some insight as to how the contest entry forms were distributed and even the demographics Topps was dealing with:

"Those forms were on a cardboard pad not taped to a box or in the box. Me, my sisters and a lot of my friends took an entry form and filled it out. I grew up in Brownfield, PA which had a population of about 700 people maybe. Probably 25/30 of my friends entered the contest. So figure about 30 from a tiny little town."

If you're wondering, Brownfield is in the Southwest corner of Pennsylvania, deep in coal country. Well, stay tuned!

Saturday, August 15, 2026

Topps Topics: Studies in Uncut Sheet Arrays - The Update

 



Tday we recap and update Mark Pekrul's six part series covering the Topps vintage uncut sheet arrays that examined the use of short prints and double prints by Topps in their vintage era. Part one can be found HERE, part two HERE, part three HERE, part four HERE, part five HERE, and part six HEREThis work was essentially been compiled independently of anything I’ve posted previously. Mark maintains a website that covers Topps Baseball sets from 1965 to 1994 in some commendable depth as well,  CLICK HERE to be transported.

As some of the analysis relied upon recreations of sheets from various partial snippets and miscuts of varying degree, a few years are really works in progress. As such, some updating is necessary. I've cross-post links and updates for the affected years in the prior posts accordingly.

FROM 1961-1964:

Entries on 1961 series 5 and 6 completely updated: 

Series 5 and 6 feature seven 11-card rows – a number not previously utilized and one which creates its own problems that can only be resolved by even more differences in print quantities per series.  In later years, Topps would develop a fairly standard way in which to format 77-card series, but initially things were a little crazy.

 We are fortunate to have images of both 1961 series 5 slits:

           

These establish the following row patterns:

Slit A: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, A, B, C, D, G

Slit B: E, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, A, B, C, D

Cards in rows E and G are printed in ¾ the amount of cards in rows A, B, C and D.  These short-prints are:

E:

Hank Aaron (415)

Jack Chesbro Baseball Thrills (407)

Larry Sherry (412)

Braves Team Photo (463) [error – card number should be 426]

Dick Bertell (441)

Cliff Cook (399)

Eddie Yost (413)

Lou Gehrig Baseball Thrills (405)

Vern Law (400)

Bob Hendley (372)

Ralph Terry (389)

 

G:

Ken Boyer (375)

Dick Howser (416)

Ken Walters (394)

Walter Johnson Baseball Thrills (409)

Yogi Berra (425)

Bob Aspromonte (396)

Tom Borland (419)

Babe Ruth Baseball Thrills (401)

Mike Roarke (376)

Dick Ellsworth (427)

Frisco First Liners (383)

 

Only appearing two times, cards in row F are short-printed by ½ compared to cards from A, B, C and D:

F:

Ray Barker (428)

Charlie Neal (423)

Christy Mathewson Baseball Thrills (408)

Ty Cline (421)

Bill Mazeroski (430)

Juan Marichal (417)

5th Series Checklist (361)

Bill Skowron (371)

Bob “Hawk” Taylor (446)

Don Larsen Baseball Thrills (402)

Jim Maloney (436)

 Reconstructions of each series 6 slit demonstrates the exact same row patterns as with series 5, and the exact same number and variety of short-prints. 

Those cards printed in ¾ the amount of the majority are:

E:

Jim Pagliaroni (519)

Ernie Banks MVP (485)

Harvey Kuenn (500)

Andy Carey (518)

Red Schoendienst (505)

Elston Howard (495)

Indians Team Card (467)

Hank Aaron MVP (484)

Jack Fisher (463)

Dick Farrell (522)

Johnny James (457)

 

G:

Phil Rizzuto MVP (471)

Joe Morgan (511)

Jim Bunning (490)

Ken MacKenzie (496)

Smoky Burgess (461)

Gil Hodges (460)

Willie Mays MVP (482)

Art Ditmar (510)

Jim Lemon (450)

Willie Tasby (458)

John DeMerit (501)

 

As in the 5th series, the cards in row F appear at 50% the rate of the majority:

F:

Joe Cunningham (520)

Jackie Brandt (515)

Tom Cheney (494)

Series 7 Checklist (516)

Yogi Berra MVP (472)

Roy McMillan (465)

Ray Herbert (498)

Leroy Thomas (464)

Bob Will (512)

Walt Dropo (489)

Roy Campanella MVP (480)

  

Entries on 1962 series 5 and 6 updated:

Series 5-7 each contain 77 cards, but we don’t have enough information to know whether they continue the odd formatting from 1961 or not.   One slit from series 6 has been reconstructed, which displays the following row pattern:

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, A, B, C, F, G

This is different from 1961 but doesn’t offer enough information to make any firm assessment of what the other slit looked like or what cards may have been over- or short-printed.   

 

Entry on 1963 series 5 update:

For series 5, we have been able to reconstruct one of the slits.  77-card series were still apparently flummoxing Topps because this slit shows a row pattern of:

A, B, C, A, D, E, F, G, A, B, C, A

That’s 4 times for row A, 2 each for rows B and C, and only one time each for D, E, F and G.  This sets up no end of short- and over-printing possibilities, but until the appearance of the other slit can be determined, we don’t yet have enough to go on. 

 

  

1964 series 5 introduction update:

For the 77-card series 5, we have a composite image (made up of two partials) of one of the slits.  It presents a much more orderly arrangement than previous 77-card slit layouts:

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, A, B, C, D, E

An examination of card counts at eBay has allowed us to be all but certain that 33 cards (three rows) were over-printed by 33%:

1964 series 6 introduction update:

Both series 6 slits have been reconstructed.  The identified row patterns are:

A: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, A, B, C, D, E

B: D, E, F, G, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, A

This creates a scenario in which three rows are over-printed (four times each) compared to the other four (three times each).  Though specific row arrangements occasionally vary, this pattern of 4x/3x with three rows over-printed continues in subsequent Topps 77-card series, and all but certainly applies to series 5 of this 1964 set. 

1967 Series 6 introduction update:

Recently, an image of a full series 6 sheet appeared on eBay.  This confirms the following row pattern:

Slit A: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, A, B, C, D, E

Slit B: C, D, F, G, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, A

Cards in rows A, C and D were over-printed:

 

From the 1969 series 4 introduction update:

For the first time since 1961 (perhaps 1962 and/or 1963 as well), a Topps series contains short-printed cards.  Rows D, E and I appear only twice each across a full sheet, while the other rows make 3 appearances each.  D, E and I are therefore short-prints.

-------------

There could be more updates down the road.  Stay tuned!


Saturday, August 1, 2026

Topps Topics: Studies in Uncut Sheet Arrays - 1973 to 1992

 



Presenting the concluding part six of an ongoing series examining the use of short prints and double prints by Topps in their vintage era; part one can be found HERE, part two HERE, part three HERE, part four HERE and part five HERE. Today Mark Pekrul is taking a long look at the 1973 to 1993 press sheets for the annual Topps Baseball sets, a time when more cards were added in each successive year and also brought Topps just about to the end of issuing sports cards in series.  Mark, who posts as “deweyinthehall” on Net54 Baseball  has dug into these along with a couple of other stalwarts over there and worked to reconstruct most of the print arrays for all Topps Baseball series from roughly 1955 to 1970 (1971 and 1972 are mostly known but will be covered here nonetheless).  This work has essentially been compiled independently of anything I’ve posted previously. Mark maintains a website that covers Topps Baseball sets from 1965 to 1994 in some commendable depth as well,  CLICK HERE to be transported.

As a reminder, from 1957 through 1995, all Topps standard-sized (i.e. 2.5 x 3.5 inches) sets, sports and non-sports alike, were printed on sheets containing two large blocks of cards, 11 columns by 12 cards each.  This created discrete groups of 132 cards, in many cases giving us complete set counts which are very recognizable today – 132, 264, 396, 528, 660 and 792.  Some early hockey and football sets, as well as many non-sports sets, had only 66 cards – exactly half of 132.

Therefore, when we hear the term “uncut sheet” today, we typically think of a roughly 2' x 4' array of 132 cards. However, a full standard-sized uncut sheet was twice as large, and had 2 groupings of 132 cards (as above).  The outside margins were white (even for sets with colored borders, such as 1971 or 1962) and contained various notations including positioning and cutting guides and other errata.  They eventually even featured commodity codes, just like Topps used for cases, boxes and packs.

Down the middle ran a thick white space called the “gutter” – full sheets were sliced down the gutter before each half-sheet, or ‘slit’, was then fed into a cutter. 

Each slit contained 12 rows of 11 cards.   For ease of reference, we can label the rows A-L and columns 1-11. Any card position can then be designated as A-1 (far upper left), L-11 (bottom right), and so forth, as shown below.

             SLIT A                                                                      SLIT B

Here is the final, big burst:


1973 Topps Baseball – 660 Total Cards in Set

Series 1: 1-132, 132 different cards

Series 2: 133-264, 132 different cards

Series 3: 265-396, 132 different cards

Series 4: 397-528, 132 different cards

Series 5: 529-660, 132 different cards

In addition to a card count reduction of more than 100, 1973 marked the first year Topps’ baseball card set was not issued exclusively by series.  Depending upon where you lived in the country, you may have still waded through the set series-by-series as the year went along, or you may have received both card #1 and card #660 in the same pack in March.  Further, 1973 was the first year where, even if you received cards by series, the checklists were not reprinted in successive series, allowing each series to include exactly 132 different cards.  Thus, a nice round 660 (132x5) cards in the set.

Probably because of these differing packaging and distribution processes, most series were printed in two different ways.   

We know that series 1-4 were each printed in blocks of 66 cards across a full sheet:

Slit A: A, B, C, D, E, F, A, B, C, D, E, F

Slit B: G, H, I, J, K, L, G, H, I, J, K, L

We also know each was printed such that a single slit contained all 12 different rows, A-L top to bottom.

These images from series 3 illustrate this:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                       

                                                          

For series 5, all we have are the two 66-card block slits.  There is no evidence that series 5 was ever printed in a full 132-card fashion.

What may explain this is that the 66-card block sheets were used for series-by-series distribution, while the 132-card slits were used for all-at-once distribution.  If this is so, each 132-card slit might have been paired with a 132-card slit from another series on a full sheet.  We don’t have any full-sheet images so this is speculative. 

In such a scenario, series 1&2 and 3&4 would be captured on two different full sheets.  When series 5 hit the presses, there was no need to pair with another series (or manner to do so without creating print volume disparities from series to series).  Hence, all we have for series 5 is the 66-card block formulation from which both types of distribution were drawn.

 

1974-1977 Topps Baseball – 660 Total Cards in Each Set

Gone were series.

All 660 cards appeared on one of five 132-card slits.  With exception of slits containing Traded cards in 1974 and 1976, it is believed that each full sheet featured two identical slits, with one having indicia containing a single * on back and the other **. 

What bears mentioning is how Topps managed the Traded set in 1976.

In 1974, evidence suggests that the 44-card Traded sets were printed separately from the main set, with three full sets per slit (four 11-card rows repeated in blocks, three times per slit).

In 1976, however, Topps took a different route.   One of the regular full sheets (with two slits formatted A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L) was reformatted such that each slit appeared (T=Traded Card Row):

Slit A: TA, TB, A, B, C, TA, TB, D, E, F, TA, TB

Slit B: TC, TD, G, H, I, TC, TD, J, K, L, TC, TD

This is illustrated in the images below.  Topps likely reduced the print run of the normal version of this full sheet in order to avoid over-prints. 

 

                                 

                                                                                                  

 

1978-1981 Topps Baseball – 726 Total Cards in Each Set

Remember that just a few years after MLB expanded from 20 to 24 clubs, Topps shrunk its sets from nearly 800 cards down to 660.  In 1978, the year after the Mariners and Blue Jays were introduced, Topps finally felt it was time to expand their set sizes again, but for whatever reason didn’t expand by a full slit of 132 additional cards.  Instead, they only went with 66 more cards, for a total of merely 726 cards per set. 

Adding just 66 cards created a challenge when formatting slits and sheets – do they print a 6th slit with all 66 new cards printed in blocks, two per slit?  Do they over-print six rows from the other five slits on a new 6th slit, and add the new 66 cards below or above them?  Nope.

What Topps actually did was expand to six slits, and feature a single double-printed row on each.  This would give each of the six slits 121 total cards, and, doing the math, this gets us to 726 cards in the set. 

So, from 1978-1981, each set features 66 cards which are double printed.  All 24 slits from these sets feature a row pattern of:

A, B, C, D, E, E, F, G, H, I, J, K:

                                              

 

                                             

The 24 double-printed E rows are:

1978:

1979:




 

1980:





 

1981:

 

So, if you recall getting an excess of certain cards as you were busting packs in these years (and I sure do), you now have a good idea why.

Also, 1978 was when Topps began affixing a lettered code near the copyright data on each card’s reverse.  Letters A-F were used and they corresponded to which slit from which the card was cut.  In the example from 1978 earlier in this section, this is the F slit from that year, and each card it contains features a little “F” on the reverse.  This system held through 1992, after which Topps began mixing and matching blocks of cards with different letter codes on the same slit.

 

Beyond

From 1982-1992, Topps sets featured 792 cards.  Each set was cut from six different slits, lettered A-F, which each featured 132 different cards, as in this example from 1983:

                                               

 

In 1993, Topps began issuing its base sets in two separate series, and started using slits which featured cards with more than a single print code letter on the reverse.  

Finally, in 1996, Topps changed things up completely and for the first time since 1956 did not utilize 132-card slits at all.

-------------------

This concludes Mark's look at a multitude of Topps sheet arrays.  We'll have a wrap-up/update post next time out.